Modified:
13 Jul 2008
by Dhc

Vote totals:

Yes:

0%

No:

0%

Neutral:

0%

 
Tell a Friend
(Use commas to separate)
Bookmark and Share
Subscribe to Debate

Join Mailing List

Key Links

Debatewise debate DEBATE: ADVANCES IN INTERNET TECHNOLOGY AND POWERFUL INDUSTRIES ADVERSLY AFFECT INDIVIDUALS

<p> Two issues up for debate here. a) User interaction has made the internet a good thing. Has it? File sharers should be taxed by their ISPs. Should they? Here's my six pennies worth: </p> <p> a) People are losing vast amounts of privacy, adversely affecting their own future, and wasting lots of time on social network sites. Social networking sites now take up a huge percentage of internet traffic. People "digg" them. In a big way. But why??? Most people I've spoken to claim to dislike the intrusive nature of them. Yet in spite of this, they still post on them. With their real names. No pseudonyms. They post pictures of their families, their new born babies, their drunken nights out in town and anything else that happens in their life onto sites which often reside in different countries, with different or non existent data protection laws, in the full knowledge that they are waiving propriety rights to all of their content. But they still do it regardless. Most people with a decent amount of common sense are tuned in to the fact that employers use search engines to check up on their employees or potential employees, and yet they still do it. Not to mention the fact that it completely wastes their time. Why do they continue to use them? Are they unaware that full SQL and file system backups are taken regularly and that even if they 'delete' content, it is not really 'deleted'? Are they not bothered that a few large corporations are in possession of large quantities of personal data? And don't bother trying to defend this with the same old, tired, 'they already know everything about you anyway' line. That's pathetic. 'They' don't, the government might. And the government have got an even better chance with these networking sites. Its called putting it on a plate. Not to mention the fact that it might fall into the wrong hands. We all saw what happened with the Home Office... and its not like these websites are impenetrable. People: GET. A. GRIP! </p> <p> b) Everyone downloads. Fact. Legal or illegal is another question, but propositions for imposing an ISP tax? Get real. This just isn't going anywhere. Anyone that tries convincing you this is a good thing needs a bullet in the head. What if you're sharing legit files? 'Oh but they'll filter the illegal from the legal out!' I disagree profusely that telecoms companies should even be allowed, without warrant, to even inspect traffic on your line. Just. No. </p> <p> Comments welcome. </p>





Debatewise debateADVANCES IN INTERNET TECHNOLOGY AND POWERFUL INDUSTRIES ADVERSLY AFFECT INDIVIDUALS


Social Networking


a) People are losing vast amounts of privacy, adversely affecting their own future, and wasting lots of time on social network sites. Social networking sites now take up a huge percentage of internet traffic. People "digg" them. In a big way. But why??? Most people I’ve spoken to claim to dislike the intrusive nature of them. Yet in spite of this, they still post on them. With their real names. No pseudonyms. They post pictures of their families, their new born babies, their drunken nights out in town and anything else that happens in their life onto sites which often reside in different countries, with different or non existent data protection laws, in the full knowledge that they are waiving propriety rights to all of their content. But they still do it regardless. Most people with a decent amount of common sense are tuned in to the fact that employers use search engines to check up on their employees or potential employees, and yet they still do it. Not to mention the fact that it completely wastes their time. Why do they continue to use them? Are they unaware that full SQL and file system backups are taken regularly and that even if they ‘delete’ content, it is not really ‘deleted’? Are they not bothered that a few large corporations are in possession of large quantities of personal data? And don’t bother trying to defend this with the same old, tired, ‘they already know everything about you anyway’ line. That’s pathetic. ‘They’ don’t, the government might. And the government have got an even better chance with these networking sites. Its called putting it on a plate. Not to mention the fact that it might fall into the wrong hands. We all saw what happened with the Home Office… and its not like these websites are impenetrable. People: GET. A. GRIP!

People get enjoyment out of using social netowrking sites. That is what life is about, having a good time. People don’t have to post all of their personal information, and if they do, they can alter their privacy settings so that only a limited number of people can see these details.


What do you think?  Vote on this point below.
Absolutely Agree For
Strongly Agree For
Mostly Agree For
Partially Agree For
Neutral
Partially Agree Against
Mostly Agree Against
Strongly Agree Against
Absolutely Agree Against


Vote on the overall debate: Advances in internet technology and powerful industries adversly affect individuals

What do you think?  Vote on this point below.
Absolutely Agree For
Strongly Agree For
Mostly Agree For
Partially Agree For
Neutral
Partially Agree Against
Mostly Agree Against
Strongly Agree Against
Absolutely Agree Against

Comments about this debate

There are no comments for this debate


Add your own comment

Login or register to leave a comment
Loading...