Vote totals:
Yes:
40%
No:
60%
Neutral:
0%
DEBATE: EVOLUTION CAN BE DISPROVED.
EVOLUTION CAN BE DISPROVED.
New species cannot arise through evolution
Many people know the basis of evolution; that through variations and natural selection new species can arise. However, it has been proven that variations are just that: variations of genes. New information cannot be added, and so new a species cannot be created from another.
See what Richard Dawkins has (or hasn’t) to say about this:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=zaKryi3605g
The theory of evolution by natural selection can be summed up as follows:
- Individuals of any group recognised as a ‘species’ vary.
- Some of these variations survive better than others.
- The variations are heritable (i.e. the offspring inherit the characteristic which makes the parents different from the rest of the population).
- Those that survive best (obviously) are the ones that end up producing most offspring.
- Over generations, the frequency of individuals with the most ‘useful’ (for that environment) variations will increase because they are the ones that produce most offspring.
The above is obvious to grasp by conducting a thought experiment. Imagine a (very) large room containing a cat and lots of mice. These are particularly unusual mice in that they do not have to mate to produce offspring (for simplicity) – they simply replicate themselves. Imagine that you begin with 30 black mice and 1 albino (white). The mice all reproduce at the same rate and the room is painted white. The black mice strand out so most eventually get killed by the cat. As such, they have less time to produce offspring than the white mice. Since mice, like humans, get their colour from their parents (i.e. this is an inherited characteristic), black mice produce black offspring and white mice produce white ones. Soon the number of black mice has been reduced since they keep getting killed before they have a chance to clone themselves. The white mice, on the other hand, are blending into the background and avoiding the cat. They survive longer and replicate themselves more. Over time, all the black mice die and the white ones remain.
The same occurs with wild populations except in a much more complicated manner since the variations are many – not just a single color – and there is sexual reproduction. In the thought experiment the white mouse was included at the start – in the wild it would arise due to a mutation (a ‘mistake’ in the gene that normally produces black pigment. Pigments are proteins. A pigment that is not functional results in albinism). Mutations are random. They occur when DNA replication goes wrong.
Adding information is easy. Sometimes a whole genome gets duplicated (as in polyploids). The duplicate genes are then free to mutate and produce new proteins with new functions. Alternatively, a single chromosome or gene gets copied. They can also be lost or even introduced from entirely different species as is the case with retrotransposons – DNA sequences originating from viruses. However, it also isn’t necessary to add new information in this sense at all. As with the mouse example above, a ‘mistake’ in an existing gene is enough to lead to changes in appearance and, therefore, evolution.
EVOLUTION CAN BE DISPROVED.
Evolution from chemicals is impossible
Scientists have found that within a cell there are thousands of "biochemical machines". For a cell to function, thousands of these machines must be placed in the correct concentration, at the correct time, and at the correct location.
Evolutionists believe that the very first life forms formed from a primordial soup of chemicals. However, without these "machines" no life can "evolve" from it.
Also, the odds of a single protein molecule forming by chance is 1 in 10 to the power of 243 (that is a 10 followed by 243 0’s). A single cell is comprised of millions of protein molecules.
This is an irrelevant argument – a straw man. The theory of evolution does not deal with how life first emerged. That is abiogenesis.
Evolution only explains speciation and changes in organisms over time ONCE life has emerged.
There is, however, on-going research into how life did first emerge and it is very likely to have been the result of simple self-replicating RNA-type molecules that later found themselves within a lipid bilayer similar to those that make up cell membranes today. Spherical lipid bilayers form naturally due to simple laws of physics in the same way that soap bubbles do.
EVOLUTION CAN BE DISPROVED.
Evolution of the homo sapien?
If evolution is an ongoing process, why haven’t we seen it occurring with homo sapiens till now? It seems like just after the theory of evolution was ‘realised’, evolution somehow came to a halt. Has the modern human man achieved a state of complete perfection in form and quality by your understanding? Or do you believe that we have yet to evolve into a more sophisticated species?
EVOLUTION CAN BE DISPROVED.
Absence of intermediate species between man and ape.
If evolution is inevitable in all circumstances, why do apes still exist? Why haven’t they evolved into humans? Why aren’t there communities of intermediates species that are in the process of transformation from ape to homo sapien? Why is there such a huge gap between the most primitive and the most developed, the beginning and the end of the chain of evolution? To where did the creatures in the middle vanish?
EVOLUTION CAN BE DISPROVED.
Evidence for Evolution – Vestigial Organs
"Body parts thought to be useless remnants of past evolutionary development.”(crit.) Back in 1895, Robert Wiedersheim listed 180 alleged vestigial organs. This list included: tonsils, coccyx (tail bone), thymus, little toe, male nipples, ear nodes, pineal gland, adenoids, appendix, wisdom teeth, parathyroid, ear muscles, body hair, and the nictitating membrane of the eye. Since the compilation of Wiedersheim’s list at the end of the 19th century, we have discovered important biological functions for every one of these so-called vestigial organs. Roy Hartenstein comments on the human appendix: "Long regarded as a vestigial organ with no function in the human body, the appendix is now thought to be one of the sites where immune responses are initiated."
-Grolier Encyclopedia, 1998.
EVOLUTION CAN BE DISPROVED.
Yes it can… but that’s a good thing!
In science, all hypotheses – and, once established, theories – need to be possible to disprove. That evolution COULD be disproved is, therefore, excellent news! This simply means that the theory of evolution by natural selection constitutes legitimate science.
A distinction must be drawn between the theoretical possibility of disproving the theory of evolution by natural selection and whether this has already been done.
Yes, evolution by natural selection COULD be disproved if, for example, fossil rabbits were discovered from 3.5 billion years ago when mammals had not yet evolved according to the theory. Or, for instance, if we discovered that mutations are not heritable after all.
However, evolution by natural selection had not, thus far, been disproved.
I reckon most non-Christians fear death. Accept Jesus as your LORD and Saviour today and be set free from the fear of death. He conquered death on Calvary.
Praise God, thank You LORD.